Showing posts with label feedback. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feedback. Show all posts

Website Feedback

This is the feedback we received for the first draft of our website

First is a range of things people liked and thought worked:

-Love their website, lots of work has been put into it which shows.
-Like the extra girls tab with band info, this is very effective as it lets the target users get more involved and more personal.

-Like the homepage, makes the band look really good
-Like the merchandise- good variety
-I like the gallery, it suits the band well
-Overall a good website

-Very good layout and the front photo is good. 
-I like the way the name of the band appears. 
-Very good movement on the other pages
-Good in the depth of information about each individual artist. 

-The front page is very clear and easy to use with good quality photos that give a clear band image
-The countdown to the release of the music video is a good touch and looks professional
-The page about each band member is excellent and gives the audience extra information about th band.
- The gallery had a number of high-quality photographs which are good because they show how the music was made. 
-The tour dates page is very good because it links to Ticketmaster

-The sassy photo is cheeky and fun
-The girls page is clever and inventive
-The moving background on the tour page is clever.
-Social media aspects are good

-Very professional looking website and has good use of countdown towards the music video release which I think looks effective
-The girls page is very good with the use of changing pictures.
-You are immediately drawn to the background as the photo of the girls stands out through the flash effects. 
-The band image is portrayed well

The following comments are from people about what they think we need to change or improve on:

-Our music page needs to be completed
-Tour dates page is very basic
-The instagram page could use some more pictures
-Need some photos in a different location
-The colour scheme needs to match the digipak more
-The moving background is sometimes distracting
-The countdown should be larger and draw more attention










Feedback on first draft

Shooting material that is appropriate to the task set:
-The Locations match the song
-The club scene footage is very good
-Looks like a real music video
-White sheet scenes don't look great
-Need one member to take the lead

Framing a shot, including and excluding elements as appropriate & variety of shots and distances:
-Good range of shots
-Lots of locations and the lighting looks good
-Good variety of distances
-The members all change position too much
-Cut out the white background scenes
-Face paint shot cut so you can't see the last person
-Could use more angles of shots
-Groups shots and white wall aren't framed as well

Holding a steady shot:
-Most shots steady
-The movement of camera is good
-Good camera work apart from white wall scene
-Only the white wall wasn't steady

Selecting mise en scene including colour, figure, lighting, objects and setting:
-Good shots in the club
-Nice range of colours
-Lighting is excellent, neon works well
-Nightclub had lots of good shots
-Costumes and colours suits each person well, clear identity
-Good setting and make-up
-Looks like a pop band
-Some shots lighting could be better
-White wall scenes too different

Editing so that meaning is apparent to the viewer:
-Energetic good cuts
-Editing on point
-The electronic part is really good
-the reverse shots are effective
-fits lyrics and transitions
-Sometimes shots linger

Using varied shot transitions and other effects selectively:
-Good transitions
-Good effects
-Lots of cuts but needs more
-Use more transitions
-More effects needed

Using sound with images and editing:
-Very well matched to sound
-Good number of thought beats
-Lip syncing was on point
-Not so many cuts in verses

Comments:
-Club shots are very good
-Like the beginning and end
-Costumes really show personalitys
-Dont like the fireworks
-White wall scene doesn't work
-Frankie needs to perform more than other- natural performer
-Some cuts and transtitions are too fast
-Taine needs to be edited out- he doesn't fit with the genre

Grades:
Lowest: 23/40
Highest: 36/40
Average: 30-32/40

Thing we need to change